[MacPorts] #53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[MacPorts] #53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21

MacPorts
#53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21
--------------------+-------------------------
 Reporter:  l2dy    |      Owner:
     Type:  update  |     Status:  new
 Priority:  Normal  |  Milestone:
Component:  ports   |    Version:
 Keywords:          |       Port:  ghostscript
--------------------+-------------------------


--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53805>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [MacPorts] #53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21

MacPorts
#53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21
--------------------------+---------------------------------
  Reporter:  l2dy         |      Owner:  MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
      Type:  update       |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal       |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports        |    Version:
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:
      Port:  ghostscript  |
--------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by MarcusCalhoun-Lopez):

 * status:  new => closed
 * owner:   => MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
 * resolution:   => fixed


Comment:

 In [changeset:"947d9823ca5dbb38be98ae5730e725f7af787693/macports-ports"
 947d9823ca5dbb38be98ae5730e725f7af787693/macports-ports]:
 {{{
 #!ConfigurableCommitTicketReference repository="macports-ports"
 revision="947d9823ca5dbb38be98ae5730e725f7af787693"
 ghostscript: update version 9.19->9.21

 Fixes https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53805
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53805#comment:1>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [MacPorts] #53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21

MacPorts
In reply to this post by MacPorts
#53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21
--------------------------+---------------------------------
  Reporter:  l2dy         |      Owner:  MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
      Type:  update       |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal       |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports        |    Version:
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:
      Port:  ghostscript  |
--------------------------+---------------------------------

Comment (by ryandesign):

 This changed the install_name of libgs.dylib, so all ports that link to
 that library need to be revbumped. Before you do that, you need to fix it
 so that libgs.dylib gets the correct install_name again (with the full
 path to the library); see #54019.

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53805#comment:3>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: [MacPorts] #53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21

MacPorts
In reply to this post by MacPorts
#53805: ghostscript @9.19: update to 9.21
--------------------------+---------------------------------
  Reporter:  l2dy         |      Owner:  MarcusCalhoun-Lopez
      Type:  update       |     Status:  closed
  Priority:  Normal       |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports        |    Version:
Resolution:  fixed        |   Keywords:
      Port:  ghostscript  |
--------------------------+---------------------------------

Comment (by neverpanic):

 In [changeset:"fd91a5d970954bd66ae88e47adeb8d1daa8cfbe5/macports-ports"
 fd91a5d970954bd66ae88e47adeb8d1daa8cfbe5/macports-ports]:
 {{{
 #!ConfigurableCommitTicketReference repository="macports-ports"
 revision="fd91a5d970954bd66ae88e47adeb8d1daa8cfbe5"
 Revbump library users of ghostscript

 After the ghostscript update in 947d9823ca, the install name of the
 ghostscript library changed. All dependents need to be rebuilt against
 the new libgs.dylib, so revbump them.

 This list has been generated using 'port echo depends:ghostscript'.
 I have manually excluded ports that only had a runtime dependency (as
 opposed to a library dependency), assuming they would only need the
 binary. I have also excluded ports with library dependencies that only
 seem to use the 'gs' binary (e.g. because they declare
 depends_skip_archcheck for ghostscript).

 See: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53805
 See: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54019
 }}}

--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/53805#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
Loading...